Skip to content

Same difference: Distinctiveness vs differentiation in B2B tech.

By on

A Cremarc effectiveness report

Cremarc _ Same difference - distinctiveness versus differentiation in B2B Tech marketing

Most B2B tech brands spend a huge amount of time trying to sound different. But before a buyer can decide you’re better, they need to remember you exist. This guide explains the different jobs of brand distinctiveness and differentiation – and why the strongest B2B brands build both.


B2B marketing has a sameness problem. Similar claims. Similar language. Similar layouts. Similar photography. Similar promises to be smarter, faster, more flexible and more secure.

The usual response is to search even harder for a differentiated proposition. But differentiation only helps if buyers notice, recognise and remember the brand making the claim in the first place.

This report separates two ideas that are often treated as competing philosophies. Distinctiveness creates mental availability. Differentiation creates a reason to choose. The strongest brands understand the role of each – and build them in the right order.

In this guide you’ll discover:

  • The different jobs distinctiveness and differentiation perform in the buying process.
  • Why being remembered often comes before being preferred.
  • What the evidence says about the relative impact of distinctiveness, differentiation and combining both.
  • Why B2B tech brands so often disappear into category conventions.
  • Which distinctive brand assets are most effective at creating recognition.
  • Why consistency allows distinctive assets to become more valuable over time.
  • Why challenger brands need both memory and a compelling reason for buyers to switch.
  • A five-stage framework for getting noticed, recognised, remembered and ultimately chosen.

Resources

See all resources