Gabe Green
Unignorable: How B2B tech brands get noticed, remembered and chosen
The evidence behind effective B2B tech marketing - how attention, distinctiveness and consistency help brands…
There’s a comforting myth in B2B marketing; that buyers are carefully comparing propositions, analysing feature matrices, weighing cost-benefit ratios, and rationally calculating ‘the best choice.’
It’s a nice story.
It’s just not how humans work, though. And B2B buyers are human.
We’re not optimisers. We’re disaster‑avoiders.
And the sooner B2B marketers accept that truth, the sooner they can start building brands that actually win in the real world – not the theoretical one found in procurement manuals.
Rory Sutherland puts it perfectly:
“We’re pretending to answer the question ‘What’s the best option here?’ when really our subconscious is answering the question ‘What’s the worst that could happen here and how do I avoid that?’”
Evolutionarily, perfection has never mattered. Safety has.
Our ancestors didn’t pick berries by ranking sweetness, antioxidant levels, and shelf life.
They picked whatever berries they saw everyone else eating without dying.
Safety in numbers.
Social proof as survival instinct.
Follow the crowd. Live another day.
That ancient wiring didn’t vanish with cloud computing and procurement frameworks. It simply migrated.
Today’s B2B buyer – whether they’re selecting an ERP system, a managed IT provider, or a machine for a factory – is still subconsciously asking:
“Which option is least likely to blow up in my face?”
The worst outcome isn’t missing out on the “best” solution.
The worst outcome is choosing the one that explodes and gets them fired.
This is why category leaders win disproportionally – even when the challenger product is objectively superior. It’s probably the reason why Byron Sharp’s How Brands Grow data uncovers the Double Jeopardy law.
Big brands aren’t chosen because they’re the best.
They’re chosen because they’re the safest bet.
“If lots of other people chose it, then it can’t be that wrong.”
This is the psychology behind:
“Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.”
The old‑guard dominance in high‑regulation industries.
Shortlists that mysteriously look identical across organisations.
Procurement teams gravitating to the brand they’ve simply heard of the most.
This isn’t laziness.
It’s risk‑minimisation.
It’s human.
And it makes perfect sense in a high‑stakes B2B context where decisions are visible, expensive, and career‑defining.
After the decision, we rationalise it with benefits.
“We chose them because of their advanced automation.”
“We liked their integration roadmap.”
“The ROI model stacked up.”
Let’s be honest: most of that comes afterwards.
Buyers justify decisions with benefits.
They make decisions based on perceived risk. They’ve already chosen the brand they want.
Every B2B marketer has sat in a room where a buyer explains their “data‑driven” choice, while you know full well the deal was won in the first 10 seconds through familiarity, safety and social proof.
Humans don’t optimise for perfection.
Humans optimise for the least downside.
Research indicates that approximately 85% of purchases are made by consumers who are already set on a specific brand before entering their buying stage.
This connects directly to something I’ve written about recently:
Brand‑building in an age of fragmented, fleeting touchpoints.
Buyers used to have long, linear journeys with a small number of heavy, high‑attention interactions.
Now they experience:
They never see enough detail from any one source to form a perfectly informed decision. They likely never read a brand’s full, intended proposition. What they do consume is the feel of the brand and the space in which is sits.
They form an impression. A vibe. A sense.
And in marketing, vibes beat logic every time.
The brand that shows up consistently, across many small moments, becomes the one that “feels” safe.
Not necessarily better.
Safer.
It’s the blueberry everyone sees everyone else eating off the hedge.
And I have data to back me up here!
If buyers default to the safest choice, then your job isn’t just to prove you’re great.
Your job is to look like the most widely used, low‑risk, default option in the category.
That means:
They aren’t asking:
“What’s the best solution?”
They’re asking:
“Which choice is least likely to go horribly wrong?”
If you want to win more deals, don’t just build the best proposition.
Build the safest‑feeling brand. The one with the natural vibe that just feels easy and safe to buy.
Show up everywhere. Consistently.
Be the obvious choice.
Be the blueberry that looks safe to eat.
And watch how quickly buyers convince themselves they chose you for the benefits all along.